|
1)
Doctors ignore drug reps?
One rep-physician visit
had no effect upon prescribing. You would think the results
would be more favorable for the over $16 Billion received in
free sample alone. This study flies in the face of conventional
wisdom. First evidence-based medicine and now evidence-based
detailing? Now wonder direct to consumer ads are still
increasing.
http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=healthNews&storyID=7033340
2) …and maybe some
Consumer to consumer advertising!
Consumer Reports will
now start to highlight BEST BUYS on prescription drugs. Some
people get bent out of shape when PBMs do this to show that
generic lovastatin can save a lot of money over the brand name
cholesterol drugs. This suggested therapeutic alternative
strategy for cash customers might help employers save some money
too. Expect some early pressure on anti-cholesterol, anti-acid,
and COX II drugs. Too bad that this is likely to be based more
on money than on therapeutics. I can almost see the "Consumer
Reports BEST BUY Formulary for 2006" and hear the patter of
pharma feet running to be listed.
http://biz.yahoo.com/rb/041209/health_consumers_2.html
3) The state of the
States' generic use…
New report shows that
Massachusetts has the highest and New Jersey (home of many
Pharma companies) and New York (home of "The Elliot") have the
lowest use of generics. How does your State fair?
http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=69641&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=650411&highlight=
4) Rogue nurse gives
real "flu shots"…
I'm sure you saw the
news about a Minnesota nurse who set up an unauthorized Flu
Vaccine administration station. Tests show that she gave real
vaccine…. lacked permission and other legal requirements… but
the students were given real vaccine by a real nurse. I expect
some hands will be slapped but she'll get of fairly lightly.
http://startribune.com/stories/462/5129692.html |